Misandry exists, and it hurts women. If you need to tear down
men for women to be strong, then you don’t think women are strong to
begin with. But the BBC would rather turn a beloved character (William
Hartnell’s First Doctor) into a sexist dinosaur for giggles. Utterly
disrespectful to the character and the actor, may he rest in peace.
Also, misandry ABOUNDED in The Last Jedi, especially towards the
characters of color, and it weakened characters like Holdo, Rey, Rose,
and FRAKKING LEIA.
I don’t understand why you don’t take misandry seriously if it’s
not against characters of color. Which I have no doubt will be the case
with the new Doctor Who, since the BBC has taken to literally firing
white men to fill diversity quotas. Like, can’t they just not have
quotas? Imagine having a quota that mandated fewer Black women. People
would be up in arms about that.
I’ve already pointed out why the assertion that white South Africans are oppressed is a load of hogwash (link, link). And naw, misogyny hurts women. What you call misandry serves several different purposes, all of which is to the detriment of women and are forms of misogyny. There are the jokes and caricatures to uphold traditional gender roles, such as the cartoonishly inept dads who can’t take care of their kids or keep the household running. Oopsie, it turns out men can’t be trusted with the home or kids and women should take care of all that after all! There are the Straw Misogynists who simplify sexism down to a few buzzwords and easily-defeatable villains, obscuring the cultural and institutional problems with sexism.
And yes, tearing down male characters so that female characters have to fix their shit is sexist, but it’s not sexist against male characters because no one takes these examples to mean men are inherently incapable or helpless. Media does not exist in a vacuum and there are millions of other pieces of rhetoric, fictional and real, that validate men as being strong and capable.
You’re right in that men don’t have to be torn down for women to be strong, that’s bad storytelling. But the problem isn’t “misandry,” it’s the fact that these kinds of distortions are seen as necessary in the first place. The problem is also racism when racist tropes are used to tear down male characters of color–and that was the problem with TLJ, not “misandry” against Finn and Poe.
Mislabeling the above, which are properly problems of misogyny and racism, to misandry and reverse racism is dishonest and misdiagnoses the entire problem. It’s a tactic of false equivalence, not coming to terms with oppression as it exists in our world.