Sometimes I fantasize about being the one to write the TLJ novelization so I can throw shade at the actual film as much as possible and just give off subtle Twitter clues that I hate it. The Reylo fandom would be especially fun to screw around with.

Just alter the framing and it could actually be made into a better story, too. The reylows are already in denial that tlj trolled them, imagine what a novelization could do 😂

mollymatterrs:

_{— for @soyeahso}

moonlandingwasfaked:

oh god it’s happening

It’s been nice knowing you all

sister-forget-me-not:

kaldannan:

doctortay:

patrickat:

child-of-dolora:

And there was never another Rogue One callsign ever – and when the Rogue Group flew the Rogue leader was always back and to the right of true lead position, because it was understood. It was believed. It was known.

Rogue One would always fly with their group, because the Force was with them.

FYI this is called ‘missing man formation’ and is done in honor and remembrance of a fallen pilot I’M NOT CRYING YOU’RE CRYING

Speaking of which:

They intentionally left that space in the middle for Carrie.

Number 2: How DARE you!

mollymerula:

mollymerula:

do you think there was like…discourse about Jane Austen novels when they first came out

ladies’ weekly tea and reading club: welcome to the meeting. we have exiled Charlotte because she stans Mr. Wickham

So asking if you are a reylo is bullying? Go lay down sweetie

Aggressively asking 10,000 times after I already answered sure is. Go be crazy and annoying on your own, away from my inbox.

And anyway, when you know how damaging r*ylo is to fans of color, especially black fans, you don’t get to be petty about your answers. Admit it one way or the other that you ship it instead of playing both sides.

Both sides, like I even could 😂 like reylows are ever going to give me the time of day after I exposed their pathetic asses again and again? I answered already in great and truthful detail, and any more demands for an answer will be deleted as the annoyances they are.

Also, that person simply asked about shipping r*ylo. They didn’t ask about the multiple definitions of shipping. You knew what they meant when they asked it. If you were defensive about it, then you simply shouldn’t have replied instead of being petty.

I answered fully and completely, according to the multiple definitions that do in fact exist. Demanding a yes or no answer to a question that has multiple meanings, and not only refusing to clarify but getting testy at me for clarifying is really disingenuous and, frankly, a bullying tactic.

Also, did you say that people are free to explore rape and abuse and we shouldn’t say anything against it? What the fuck is wrong with you. I don’t have a narrow sense of the world, you just don’t care about the horrors of rape and abuse and justify rape apologism

So people shouldn’t write about rape ever, including to show how traumatic and awful it is? Of course these works can be criticized, like Lolita has been criticized for confusing framing. But if by speak against you mean criticizing the very creation of works featuring pedophilia and rape? Then yeah, you’re drinking the crazy juice hard there my friend. Rape and abuse are parts of the human experience and should be explored through art, provided warnings are given so people are not exposed unawares. A work can be criticized for how well and responsibly it treats the subject, but to say these sensitive subjects can’t be written about or explored? That’s not a rational position and it’s actively harmful.

“No sense in getting mad at me just because your categories are too rigid for, like, reality.” You think you’re right in this but you’re really not. And that “ship what you want to ship” bullshit can get real ugly real fast. Next thing we know, you’re gonna be creating pedophilic content and trying to justify it

People do in fact create content featuring pedophilia to show how horrible and soul destroying it is, e.g. Lolita. Conflating that kind of creation with justifying pedophilia is despicably dishonest.