beemill:

Operation
Condor
was a covert, multinational “black operations” program organized
by six Latin American states (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile,
Paraguay, and Uruguay, later joined by Ecuador and Peru), with
logistical, financial, and intelligence support from Washington.

In the
Cold War climate of the 1960s and ’70s, when U.S. leaders and Latin
American militaries regarded popular movements and political dissidents
as “internal enemies,” any methods were considered legitimate in the
“war against subversion.” In fact, many of these new social movements
were indigenous nationalist, leftist, socialist, or radically democratic
forces fighting to represent the voiceless and the marginalized.

As
leftist and nationalist leaders won elections throughout Latin America
in the 1960s and early 1970s, and new revolutionary and progressive
movements gained strength, U.S. security strategists feared a
communist-inspired threat to U.S. economic and political interests in
the hemisphere. Local elites similarly feared that their traditional
political dominance and wealth were at risk. Washington poured enormous
resources into the inter-American security system, of which Condor was a
top-secret part, to mobilize and unify the militaries in order to
prevent leftist leaders from taking power and to control and destroy
leftist and popular movements in Latin America. Anticommunism and
“preventing another Cuba” were the national security priorities of the
U.S. in Latin America.

The reigning
national security doctrine incorporated counterinsurgency strategies and
concepts such as “hunter-killer” programs and secret, “unconventional”
techniques such as subversion, sabotage, and terrorism to defeat foes.
Much of counterinsurgency doctrine is classified, but scholars have
documented many of its key components. Michael McClintock, for example,
analyzed a classified U.S. Army Special Forces manual of December 1960
Counter-Insurgency Operations, one of the earliest to mention
explicitly, in its section “Terror Operations,” the use of
counterinsurgent terror as a legitimate tactic. He cites other secret
U.S. army special operations handbooks from the 1960s that endorsed
“counterterror,” including assassination and abduction, in certain
situations. One March 1961 article in Military Review stated, “Political
warfare, in short, is warfare…[that] embraces diverse forms of
coercion and violence including strikes and riots, economic sanctions,
subsidies for guerrilla or proxy warfare and, when necessary, kidnapping
or assassination of enemy elites.”  In short, “disappearance” was a key
element of counterinsurgency doctrine.

Read More: http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/Operation-Condor-Cross-Border-Disappearance-and-Death-20150523-0031.html

Do people even have the concept anymore that you can find something awful and fascinating at the same time? Like, I found Catra and Adora’s dynamic exciting, engrossing, and very, very gay. That doesn’t mean I am obliged to go around defending Catra’s every action or insisting she has to be redeemed. (I sure hope not, that would be weaksauce when she’s worked so hard to be her own person and the villain she wanted to be.) You won’t catch me going around saying that trying to kill Adora or bring about eternal winter is fine and child soldiers aren’t responsible for their actions even after they’re grown up and have been given clear chances to turn away. Adora doesn’t owe Catra a solitary shit when she’s tried for the entirety of Season 1 to get her to leave and got a nice payback in the form of attempted murder.

Do I ship it in the sense of liking the dynamic and enjoying the content? Fuck yeah! Tragedy! Villainy! Internal conflict! Bring it on! Do I ship it in the sense that I insist it must be pure and perfect because I personally like it, endlessly justify Catra’s shitty treatment of Adora and outright war crimes, and flood every tag insisting that the Rebellion are just as bad as the Horde and that Glimmer, Angella et al. are the true villains? Hell no.

(Not saying Catradora fans do this, by the way. I am referring to the behavior of a different group of annoying fans.)

If you take this as me saying you shouldn’t ship Catradora and you are a bad person if you ship it because it’s wrong and bad and impure, congratulations, you have proved you have no reading comprehension whatsofuckingever and are just putting words in my mouth, whether out of stupidity or malice.

If you think I have ever tried to dictate what other people ship beyond expressing personal distaste in the proper tags and calling for civil behavior, then congratulations, you are a liar. Fuck, I’ve even produced reylow content depicting it as the unhealthy, abusive, borderline rapey ship I see it as, and would have done more if I saw it as romantic at all (which, for the reading challenged, does not mean that you are not allowed to) and if that section of the fandom were not such a misogynistic, racist, abuse apologist nightmare.

Furthermore, if you think calling out a group or individual’s bullshit in the tags reserved for that without even interacting with them is the same thing as harassing and policing them, then CONGRATULATIONS you are a silencing piece of shit who wants to shut down opinions that differ from yours by disingenuously conflating criticism with harassment. You winner of a person you.

jewishcomeradebot:

Like… that person straight up said that two Black women were “endangering marginalized people” and “too absolutist” because they didn’t use language nuanced enough for their liking…

*flies off into the sun*

I read the two additions that set them off to figure out what was so threatening or extreme and I STILL DON’T GET IT. Also did they compare two Black women to people who wrongfully call the cops on others to frighten and harm them sdfkgjdgsgl what kind of wilfully ignorant bullshit