Man Creates Edible Water “Jelly Drops” to Help Dementia Patients Stay Hydrated

seandotpolitics:

London-based student Lewis Hornby is a grandson on a mission. When he noticed that his dementia-afflicted grandmother was having trouble staying hydrated, he came up with Jelly Drops—bite-sized pods of edible water that look just like tasty treats.

Each of these colorful “candies” is made up of mostly water, with gelling agents and electrolytes making up just 10% of their composition. Available in a rainbow of colors and presented in packaging reminiscent of a box of chocolates, Jelly Drops are an easy and engaging way to avoid dehydration—a common problem for those suffering from degenerative neurological diseases.

“It is very easy for people with dementia to become dehydrated,” he explains. “Many no longer feel thirst, don’t know how to quench thirst, or don’t have the dexterity to drink.” With this in mind, Hornby set out to find a solution. In addition to seeking advice from psychologists and doctors, he opted to “experience” life with dementia himself through the use of virtual reality tools and a week in a care home.

Once he was familiar with what dementia patients need, he brainstormed what they want. “From my observations, people with dementia find eating much easier than drinking. Even still, it can be difficult to engage and encourage them to eat. I found the best way to overcome this is to offer them a treat! This format excites people with dementia, they instantly recognize it and know how to interact with it.”

Case in point? Hornby’s own grandmother’s reaction: “When first offered, grandma ate seven Jelly Drops in 10 minutes, the equivalent to a cup full of water—something that would usually take hours and require much more assistance.”

Man Creates Edible Water “Jelly Drops” to Help Dementia Patients Stay Hydrated

Could you recommend some well-written Finn/Rey metas?

stormscavenger:

finnreyfridays:

image

Hey anon, mod Em here. Sorry, I meant to post this earlier and got sidetracked.

Thanks for the note! I gathered a list of some of my favorite metas. A few I’ve had in my favorites for awhile. Some are TFA-era, but since they deal with Finnrey overall, I’ve included them. As always, people are welcome to contribute to the list!


Why Finnrey works from top to bottom and that other ship … doesn’t. [x]

Where was Rey going when she rejected the hero’s call on Takodana? [x]

Rey and Finn as the reincarnated version of Anakin and Padme. [x]

A second POV on the Anidala reincarnation theory [x]

How Finn and Rey saved each other again in TLJ [x]

Finn, Rey, Romance and Conflict [x]


Fixing Rey from TLJ to IX (this is a Rey meta but has a sizable Finnrey portion) [x]


A early Finnrey meta on Finn’s love for Rey being a defining character trait [x]


Finn + the Force (a Finn meta that has a large focus on Finnrey)

[x]

Finn, Rey and the Force   [x]

Rey turning to Kylo was all about her love for Finn [x]

Finnrey + Movement [x]

Why Finnrey does not mean Finn has to be straight [x]

Oh shit my Rey meta’s on here. Sweet 👍👍

Stop being offended over people self-identifying with the term ‘queer’

socialjusticeichigo:

5 September 2018

OPINION: Just let people live their unapologetically ‘queer’ lives without constantly reminding them the term is a slur, writes James Besanvalle

Queer is an incredibly divisive word in the LGBTI community.

Whenever we post stories on Gay Star News and describe someone as ‘queer’, there’s inevitable backlash.

Even if the person who the story is about uses the term to describe themselves, a wave of people are quick to point out it’s a slur.

Take, for example, a story we published last month about a guy winning a gaming world title.

Dominique ‘SonicFox’ McLean self-identifies as ‘queer’ but also uses ‘gay’ interchangeably to describe himself.

His Twitter bio says he’s a ‘Black Queer Furry’ (the latter because he dons his fox ‘fursona’ when he’s playing games) so we described him as such in the headline.

But when we posted the story to social media, a few people commented: ‘Queer is a slur!’ and ‘There is no excuse for using a slur. Zero.’

Yes, the term can absolutely be used as a slur. And, of course, it’s important to recognize the well-documented history of its use as a derogatory word.

But now some people are reclaiming it and it’s also important to recognize and just accept that fact.

History of the word ‘queer’

The word ‘queer’ literally means ‘strange’ or ‘odd’.

It wasn’t until about a century ago that it became a pejorative. One of the earliest recorded uses of the word as a reference to homosexuality came through an 1894 letter by John Sholto Douglas, 9th Marquess of Queensberry.

Douglas angrily wrote about the relationship his son Alfred had with famous poet Oscar Wilde. He referenced ‘snob queers’.

The term then gained popularity in the early 20th Century, most commonly used to describe gay men who engage in receptive or passive anal or oral sex with other men.

By the mid-20th Century, it became a general slur against all LGBTI people.

But by the late 1980s, activists began reclaiming the word as a neutral or even positive self-identifying term.

In 1990, an LGBTI activist group known as Queer Nation formed.

They wrote on a flyer at the time: ‘Using “queer” is a way of reminding us how we are perceived by the rest of the world. It’s a way of telling ourselves we don’t have to be witty and charming people who keep our lives discreet and marginalized in the straight world.

‘Yeah, queer can be a rough word but it is also a sly and ironic weapon we can steal from the homophobe’s hands and use against him,’ the flyer read.

Since then, people have began identifying as queer as more of an umbrella term for gender and sexual minorities.

These days, people now commonly also use the term to describe academic theory, film and literature.

Let me identify as queer if I want to

For me, identifying with the term is an act of defiance.

It’s using a term people taunted me with in the playground and flipping the narrative.

I’m reclaiming the word you used against me and proudly owning it.

Reclaiming historically offensive words thrust onto marginalized people happens all the time.

Feminists reclaimed the word ‘Suffragette’ from a place of ridicule to a word of power. Sex-positive people reclaimed the word ‘slut’ from a place of shame in promiscuity to empowerment.

So if I want to identify and reclaim the word queer, let me.

Similarly, if a celebrity (or anyone!) comes out as queer or proudly identifies with the term, who are you to object?

Why can’t we let people identify how they like, without reminding them their identity is offensive to others?

Yes, we understand the word has historically negative connotations. And yes, we understand the ‘status’ and ‘offensiveness’ of the term may have remained the same for some people.

But increasingly, we’re seeing younger generations identifying with the term.

They’re rejecting gender and sexual binaries in favor of a more fluid term. And it’s time you let them live their best unapologetically queer lives.

Stop being offended over people self-identifying with the term ‘queer’

A Star Wars story set on Ahch-to following a young Jedi girl in search of a powerful Force user to bring balance to the Force, but instead of Rey looking for Luke it’s a Moana-type story starring a singing teenage fish nun and her plucky pet porg who’s as dumb as a rock as she sails across Ahch-to in a fishing boat. Featuring Ahch-tovian language songs by Lin Manuel-Miranda and JJ Abrams

I’d watch it lmao