RO itself majorly shafted its one visible Black and physically disabled character, and the whole first act suffered for it. It had redeeming qualities but I don’t trust fans who are completely uncritical of the movie.
See, that was my major disappointment with these people. Because none of them have been uncritical of RO and the treatment all of the characters of color received including Saw.
But with TLJ it seems something in their brains shut down or something. We’re back to the “let people just have fun” and literally someone comparing the critique of TLJ coming from fans of color to people whining about the wooden acting and bad dialogue in ANH.
Really? Really!
Heck, if they’d been uncritical of RO I wouldn’t have followed them in the first place. So I’m just in the “I thought you could be partially trusted, but I guess not. More fool me then.”
Maybe it’s a case of low expectations. I remember that when I first saw ESB and RotJ in the late 90′s or so my apprehension was simply that Lando not be killed as narrative punishment for his “betrayal” or as cheap motivation for Han. I didn’t actually enjoy my first views of these movies very much because I was so afraid for him. When he made it through the trilogy alive that was a huge relief for me and I didn’t think of much past that because the bar was that low for me at the time. Tbh I didn’t have much hope that a Black character with the least bit of moral complexity would survive to the end of a Hollywood movie made in the 70′s and 80′s.
I bring this up because it’s possible these bloggers’ bar for a Black character in Star Wars is as low as mine was. Finn is a more prominent character than Saw was, and he didn’t die to further any other character’s arc, so it may be okay in their minds. I disagree with them if this is the case because Finn has different weight in the sequel trilogy than Saw or Lando (and also can we stop holding the bar ridiculously low for the treatment of Black characters in general), but this may explain the inconsistency.