starwalkerskykiller:

Kylo Ren could have been a great villain with a good backstory explaining his actions without trashing on any other characters but NO, Rian Johnson just HAD to do That

Hux could have been a great villain, proving that you don’t need the Force to be a formidable enemy, that intelligence and cunning is just as useful but NO, Rian Johnson just HAD to do That

Phasma could have been a great villain, a rival to Finn, a vicious motivation among the ranks of the stormtroopers – not just in looks but in action and thoughts as well but NO, Rian Johnson just HAD to do That

Snoke could have been a great villain, a powerful master of the Dark Side – he could have been the first Jedi who turned, he could have been Darth Plagueis, hell, he could have been a Force user unheard of from this side of the galaxy but NO, Rian Johnson just HAD to do That

trekmemes:

warp6:

lj-writes:

Just what level of “don’t ever fuck with us” is Starfleet? I mean I used to think Jem Hadar and Klingons being these fierce warrior races was something of an Informed Trait when they kept losing in face-to-face fights with mild-mannered Starfleet officers. But then I realized… it’s actually because Starfleet officers are just that tough.

Just how motivated and ambitious you have to be, as someone coming from a post-scarcity society, to sign up for such arduous training and potential danger? I have to wonder kind of people decide to go through years of rigorous education, constant work and travel, and the possibility of a nasty death when they are guaranteed lives without fear or want right on their home planets.

Could it be that Starfleet may, in fact, be a place for malcontents? Not the kind of small-time malcontent that turns to destruction and exploitation, but the kind of malcontent that is stifled on some level by the cushy existence of their home planet (even while being willing to die to protect it) and wants something more. Something out there and anywhere but here.

Such people are dangerous to the preexisting system unless they have an outlet for their energies. Just to name a few headliner captains, leave the James Kirks, the Jean-Luc Picards, the Kathryn Janeways, the Benjamin Siskos, the Philippa Georgious with nothing to do but enjoy life, and chances are they’d get restless. You can see their innate drive in the paths they didn’t take and in alternate universes: Picard has a brother who was perfectly content to run a vineyard at home, living a comfortable rural existence. Picard could have had that or any of a million other career paths, but he still chose the uncertainty of the stars. The 20th-century version of Benjamin Sisko had a burning ambition to write groundbreaking science fiction despite being struck down over and over again by racism. Georgiou was goddamned Emperor in the Mirror Universe, and Burnham and Lorcas wanted her throne. Clearly these are not people who can sit content and let the world be; they shift the very earth they stand on and reach for the stars any way they can.

So what do you do with world-shakers in paradise? You could choose to kill them or lock them up and “reeducate” them, but that goes against the Federation’s ideals. You could let them live free and potentially climb to the top, but they might make too many changes and disrupt the whole comfortable arrangement.

Or, you could give them a way out–infinite ways out, in fact, into space. Their boundless energy would be structured and channeled in morally acceptable directions by the strict rules and directives of Starfleet, and their ambition to be better than others and be judged by their abilities would find expression in rank and promotions.

These are, of course, the same individuals who would die to protect the Federation when it is threatened by a race of fierce warriors, a mechanical collective, or vast theocratic empire. The same people who would have felt stifled in civilian life and could have threatened the whole system become its fiercest defenders. It’s a brilliant system, really, that meets everyone’s interests and turns a society’s potential threats into its greatest assets.

I don’t think it’s any wonder, looking at these incredibly trained and driven people who can take down Klingons in single combat and engineer their way out of alternate timelines, that non-Federation worlds–and maybe more than a few Federation ones–hover somewhere between suspicious and outright terrified of the Federation’s intentions. Starfleet is one of the major reasons one can make a case for the Federation being a “soft” empire, and I can see why peoples ranging from the Ferengi to the Klingons are so suspicious of them. Because you do not ever fuck with Starfleet.

I love this! I feel like Starfleet is commonly seen in fandom as this awesome career everyone on Earth probably aspires to—after all, we all live with the constant potential for ugly death in our not-technologically-advanced-utopia world, and most of us would love the chance to do that but IN SPACE. But whenever I think about the actual reality of Trek!Earth, it’s like…if you live on Earth in the 22nd+ century you are literally guaranteed a long and healthy life. You are guaranteed to die only of (very) old age!!!

And there are probably plenty of safe skydiving/whitewater rafting/speed shuttle piloting/VR equivalent of all of the above and more outlets if you’re just an adrenaline junkie, and plenty of meaningful jobs that aren’t Starfleet, from creating art to doing research to civilian inventing/engineering to teaching…To have everything you could want as far as quality of life and safety and entertainment goes, and still choose Starfleet—to join the military-not-as-we-know-it-but-still-basically-the-peaceful-equivalent-of-a-military, to follow orders, to risk everything…yeah. It’s only certain people who are gonna want to do that.

Whenever I read a fic where Starfleet is referred to as “the service,” I think to myself, Exactly.

I love everything you pointed out about the kind of person who would do that. I think that the flip side, though, is that they also have to be (or become) the kind of person who is willing to follow orders, and give up a LOT of control over their lives, compared to the 22nd+ century general population, who (unlike us) never have to answer to a single boss if they don’t want to! I’m sure Starfleet is much more enlightened than, for instance, the modern US military when it comes to letting people leave Starfleet at will, rather than being in for a set number of years, but while you ARE in…you go where you’re assigned and do what you’re told.

And the conflict between that aspect of serving, and being, as you put it, a world-shaker, is fascinating. And something I think we do see on the show a lot. (What is the Prime Directive, after all, but Starfleet’s ultimate standing order?)

Starfleet is certainly a creation of pure brilliance.

It’s a home for the restless, the ambitious- the sort of people who are permanently dissatisfied with their lives no matter what they’re doing. In any society, you’re going to have people who aren’t content to settle down home on the farm, and who seek out the ‘big city’ instead. As Jim Kirk puts it, “Other people [have families], Bones, not us.”

Now what are you supposed to do with all that energy? Some might call it the adventurers’ instinct, but it presents itself mostly in troublemakers. They’re the people eternally unhappy with the status quo, who if left alone will find ways to destabilize entire regimes (or if less charismatic, make people feel miserable about their choice to ‘be ordinary’). But what are they to do once their society achieves paradise? Stay at home and stagnate? No, too dangerous- any one of them could become the next Khan Noonien Singh. It’s a ticking time bomb of internal conflict for a peaceful utopia.

So put them to work. There’s plenty of labor to be done in space: research, data collection, diplomacy, potential warfare. Let them be the arms and legs of the Federation, spreading the gospel of peace and prosperity with one hand, striking down its enemies with the other. Let them assimilate the entire quadrant into the Federation. (After all, assimilation IS what the Federation does, no less than the Borg, although this is one you’re more likely to survive with your personality and culture intact.)

Long story short: don’t fuck with Starfleet, home to nearly all the restless geniuses of 150 planets.

i-am-diana:

“black panther” literally took everything “the last jedi” wanted to do thematically, then did it a million times better

for example,

  • The Deconstruction Of The Idealized Mentor/Hero: t’chaka vs luke skywalker, the latter of which was twisted OOC to fit this role
  • The Morally Grey Villain: killmonger vs kylo ren (the latter… barely even counts as one)
  • “That’s how we’ll win. Not by destroying what we hate, but saving what we love”: initiating worldwide social reform vs whatever episode ix is going to do, idek

better luck next time RJ :/

The butthurt TLJ stans in the notes omg 😂

afunnyfeminist:

priceofliberty:

piscesintherain:

yourbigsisnissi:

Defense attorney co sign.

You make your attorneys job harder when you speak to the cops.

So, credit where due, this is a screen grab from the Twitter account @BeattyLaw, an actual defense attorney, so it’s doubly attorney-endorsed.

(Link to the original tweet)

He also has a few more (I will not speak for @yourbigsisnissi and can’t say whether she also endorses these:

(link on twitter)

(link on Twitter)

(link on Twitter)

I don’t know this guy, I just follow him on Twitter, but I’ll encourage you, if you’re on Twitter, maybe go and hit that retweet on these too – folks there need this advice as much as we do here.

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!

The police don’t inform you of your rights until you’re arrested. Before that, they take advantage of your ignorance of the law. They’re not trustworthy and they only serve and protect themselves.

After #MeToo, the men are planning a redemption tour

thehungryvortigaunt:

rapeculturerealities:

On Thursday, Tina Brown confirmed to reporters that she had been approached to produce a redemption series, in which men outed by the #MeToo movement could attempt to rebuild their reputations.

According to gossip website Page Six, “Tina said she’d just been emailed about co-hosting a new show with Charlie Rose, in which they’d interview Louis C.K., Matt Lauer and others caught up in the #MeToo sexual harassment scandals.”

In a piece published on Women’s Agenda this week, writer Kristine Ziwica warns against the inevitable festival of comeback toursplanned by men recently disgraced by revelations from the #MeToo movement. From Louis C.K. to Matt Lauer and even Harvey Weinstein, it appears the wheels are already in motion to smoothly transition these men back into public life. After all, they only have all of human history from which to pick countless other examples of men and their reputations achieving full rehabilitation no matter what their crime.

An article in The Hollywood Reporter recently invited comedy club owners to speculate on (not if, but) when Louis C.K. will be able to return to the stage. In November last year, C.K. was finally forced to admit that long standing rumours of his sexual misconduct were true and that he had indulged in numerous acts of impropriety that included masturbating in front of (female) colleagues without their permission. Louis Faranda, executive producer at Caroline’s, said he would give C.K. a platform “tomorrow”, but predicts he’ll be back within a year, “making fun of his mistakes”. Comedian Sean Patton has a suggestion for how he can best do this: “He should do an hour special that breaks down why it was wrong and how he’s made amends.”

Isn’t it great to know that years of abuse and denial can be so easily overturned by a few well chosen words and the willingness of a disgraced person to “heal” publicly?

It depressed me to read C.K. fellow colleagues (most of them men) unconsciously collaborating to restore their friend’s former glory, but it certainly didn’t surprise me. As much as our society might like to claim it opposes men’s violence and misogyny, the reality is that the collective is at best largely indifferent to it and, at worst, angry that these things can be used to “tarnish” a man’s reputation.

Think of Brendan Fevola. In 2006, Fevola took a non-consensual shower photograph of then-lover Lara Bingle (who was 19 years old at the time) and sent it to his friends and teammates. The existence of the photograph came to light in 2010, when sources said the photo had spent the previous four years being shared across mobile phones in the football world. If Fevola suffered any damage to his reputation, it was short lived. A rehabilitative stint on Channel Ten’s I’m A Celebrity, Get Me Out Of Here! led to Fevola being employed as a presenter on Fox FM, where his contract was recently extended for another two years.

Then there’s Boy George, the British import who commands a six-figure salary on Australia’s franchise of The Voice. In 2009, the pop star was given a 15-month sentence for falsely imprisoning a male escort by handcuffing him to a wall and beating him with a metal chain. The gravity of this crime and its impact on the victim can’t be overstated, yet the career of Boy George continues with, if anything, even greater steam than it enjoyed before his conviction.

When I raise my concerns about the ease with which male celebrities recover from allegations or even convictions for abuse, I’m often met with a strange kind of territorial anger. Is he never allowed to work again?! people ask. How long does he have to suffer for his one mistake?!

Both questions, while easily answered, raise further questions of their own. First, of course men accused or convicted of sexual or physical assault should be allowed to earn a living. But why should that living automatically be in the same financially and socially lucrative fields they worked in before they made the choice to exert violence and power over another person? Why should this work include endorsement deals, celebrity platforms and influence? No-one deserves these things, especially not people who’ve actively caused harm to others.

Second, sexual assault and/or physical violence are not arbitrary “mistakes”. They’re choices that have wide-reaching consequences for their victims. Framing them as simple mistakes is how the behaviour of men in particular is massaged and excused to limit any negative impact they have on their lives.

Fame should not be used to insulate men from the consequences of their actions. And men accused of such misconduct shouldn’t be considered absolved of the gravity of their crimes just because they’ve spent a bit of time in the naughty corner.

As a society, we act as if one of the worst things we can do is ostracise men even when they’ve violated another human being. But if we want the legacy of #MeToo and the testimonies of victims of male violence to actually mean something, we have to be firmer in our treatment of the people who’ve inflicted this pain and suffering on them. If we stopped allowing men to get away with anything they like, maybe some of them would stop doing anything they wanted.

When our fetishization of redemption bleeds over into reality…

After #MeToo, the men are planning a redemption tour